Spectral sequences: computation of cohomology ring

To be completed.

Being a fancy technique in computing cohomology ring HH^* in algebraic topology, spectral sequences are more generalized and thus more abstract than, somehow its prototype, long exact sequences. This post is to demonstrate some useful results in algebraic topology that can be computed with spectral sequences.


What is spectral sequence?

Let RR be a commutative ring with identity. A homological spectral sequence contains the following information:

  1. A family of RR-modules E,rE_{*,*}^r with differential

dr:Ep,qrEp+r,q+r1rd^r:E^r_{p,q}\rightarrow E_{p+r,q+r-1}^r

where rr is a positive integer called page. We say {E,r,dr}\{E^r_{*,*},d^r\} is a homological spectral sequence.

  1. The relation between rr-th page and (r+1)(r+1)-th page is as follows

Ep,qr+1:=H(Ep,qr+1,dr)E_{p,q}^{r+1}:=H(E_{p,q}^{r+1},d^r)

More precisely, the (p,q)(p,q)-term on the (r+1)(r+1)-th page is the homology of the rr-th page:

Ep,qr+1=ker(dr:Ep,qrEp+r,qr+1r)im(dr:Epr,q+r1rEp,qr).E_{p,q}^{r+1}=\frac{\ker(d^r:E_{p,q}^r\rightarrow E^r_{p+r,q-r+1})}{\mathrm{im}(d^r:E^r_{p-r,q+r-1}\rightarrow E^r_{p,q})}.

Similarly, we can define a cohomological spectral sequence {Er,,dr}\{E_r^{*,*},d_r\}​​​. Note that compared with homology, cohomology has a natural ring structure, which leads us to the world of algebras and multiplication.

Cohomological spectral sequences are mainly used in the future.

Assumption. To put the above definition in use, we have to restrict to relatively “good” spectral sequences. Thus the following assumptions are required for the discussion.

  1. (First quadrant) For p<0p<0 or q<0q<0, assume that Ep,qr=0E_{p,q}^r=0 for every rr​​.
  2. (Stable) For sufficiently large rr​, all but finitely many differentials on each column are nontrivial.

For fixed non-negative integers pp and qq, there exists R>0R>0, such that r>R\forall r>R,

dp,qr:Ep,qrEp+r,qr+1rd^r_{p,q}:E^r_{p,q}\rightarrow E^r_{p+r,q-r+1}

and

dp+r,qr+1r:Ep+r,qr+1rEp,qrd^r_{p+r,q-r+1}:E^r_{p+r,q-r+1}\rightarrow E^r_{p,q}

are trivial maps. Therefore,

Ep,qr+1=H(Ep,qr,dr)=ker(dp,qr)im(dp+r,qr+1r)=Ep,qr+1.E^{r+1}_{p,q}=H(E^r_{p,q},d^r)=\frac{\ker(d^r_{p,q})}{\mathrm{im}(d^r_{p+r,q-r+1})}=E_{p,q}^{r+1}.

Actually, we have the above equation for each r>Rr>R, which means that for each p,qp,q, the RR-module stabilizes eventually. Therefore, we can define the infinity page Ep,qE_{p,q}^\infty as

Ep,qr=Ep,qr+1==:Ep,q.E_{p,q}^r=E^{r+1}_{p,q}=\cdots=:E_{p,q}^\infty.


Convergent spectral sequences are of the main focus. Take cohomological spectral sequences for instance.

Def. (Convergence). Let {Er,,dr}\{E_r^{*,*},d_r\} be a cohomological spectral sequence and HH^* be a filtered RR-module with filtration

H=F0HF1HFmHFm+1H={0}H=F^0H\supset F^1H\supset\cdots\supset F^m H\supset F^{m+1}H=\{0\}

Say {Er,,dr}\{E_r^{*,*},d_r\} converges to HH^* if the infinity page of EE satisfies

Ep,qFpHp+q/Fp+1Hp+q.E_\infty^{p,q}\simeq F^pH^{p+q}/F^{p+1}H^{p+q}.


Preparation

We introduce some theorem, perhaps without proofs.

Theorem. Let FEBF\rightarrow E\rightarrow B be a fibration. If π1(B)\pi_1(B) acts on H(F)H^*(F) trivially (lacking definition here), then there exists a cohomological spectral sequences {Er,,dr}\{E_r^{*,*},d_r\} with

E2p,q=Hp(B;Hq(F;Z))E_2^{p,q}=H^p(B;H^q(F;\mathbb{Z}))

such that Er,E_r^{*,*}converges to H(E;Z)H^*(E;\mathbb{Z})​​, as a graded-commutative graded algebras.

Lemma. Let {Erp,q,dr}\{E_r^{p,q},d_r\} be a first quadrant cohomological spectral sequence converging to a graded algebra HH^*. If the infinity page E,E_\infty^{*,*} is a free graded-commutative bigraded algebra, then

HTot(E,)H^*\cong \mathrm{Tot}(E_\infty^{*,*})

as a free graded-commutative graded algebra.


Cohomological ring of SU(n)\mathrm{SU}(n)

In this section, we shall compute the cohomology ring H(SU(n),R)H^*(SU(n),R), where RR is a commutative ring. Denote Λ(y2k+1)\Lambda(y_{2k+1}) be the exterior RR-algebra generated by an element y2k+1y_{2k+1}, where the degree of y2k+1y_{2k+1} is y2k+1=2k+1|y_{2k+1}|=2k+1. We shall prove by induction that

H(SU(n);R)Λ(x3,,x2n1)H^*(\mathrm{SU}(n);R)\cong\Lambda(x_3,\ldots,x_{2n-1})

  1. n=2n=2, SU(2)S3SU(2)\cong S^3. By knowledge in algebraic topology, H(SU(2);R)Λ(x3)H^*(SU(2);R)\cong \Lambda(x_3).
  2. Consider the fibration

Since for n2n\geq 2, S2n1S^{2n-1} is simply-connected, then apply the theorem: there exists a first quadrant cohomological spectral sequence with second page

E2,=H(B;H(F;R))=H(S2n1;H(SU(n1);R)).E_{2}^{*,*}=H^*(B;H^*(F;R))=H^*(S^{2n-1};H^*(SU(n-1);R)).

Using universal coefficient theorem, with H(SU(n1);R)H^*(SU(n-1);R) is free,

0Hn(X)GHn(X;G)Tor(Hn+1(X),G)00\rightarrow H^n(X)\otimes G\rightarrow H^n(X;G)\rightarrow \mathrm{Tor}(H^{n+1}(X),G)\rightarrow 0

then

E2,=H(S2n1;H(SU(n1);R))=H(S2n1)H(SU(n1);R).E_{2}^{*,*}=H^*(S^{2n-1};H^*(SU(n-1);R))=H^*(S^{2n-1})\otimes H^*(SU(n-1);R).

By induction,

E2,Λ(y2n1)Λ(x3,x5,,x2n3)E^{*,*}_2\cong\Lambda(y_{2n-1})\otimes\Lambda(x_3,x_5,\ldots,x_{2n-3})

Claim. All differentials are zero.

Proof of Claim. All differentials drd_r are zero, except for r=2n1r=2n-1, as only the 00-th column and the (2n1)(2n-1)-th column are non-zero. Write the generating element in the first column as x2k1E20,2k1x_{2k-1}\in E_2^{0,2k-1}, for k=1,2,,n1k=1,2,\cdots,n-1. Then

d2n1x2k1E22n1,2k2n=0d_{2n-1}x_{2k-1}\in E_2^{2n-1,2k-2n}=0

Therefore, by Leibnitz’s rule, we obtain d2n1=0d_{2n-1}=0 as well. Thus all differentials are zero. \square

With the claim, we have

Ep,q=E2p,q=E2,Λ(y2n1)Λ(x3,x5,,x2n3)E_\infty^{p,q}=E_2^{p,q}=E^{*,*}_2\cong\Lambda(y_{2n-1})\otimes\Lambda(x_3,x_5,\ldots,x_{2n-3})

By lemma, we have

H(SU(n);R)Tot(Λ(y2n1)Λ(x3,x5,,x2n3))Λ(x3,x5,,x2n1).H^*(SU(n);R)\cong\mathrm{Tot(\Lambda(y_{2n-1})\otimes\Lambda(x_3,x_5,\ldots,x_{2n-3}))}\cong\Lambda(x_3,x_5,\ldots,x_{2n-1}).

This completes the proof.


Cohomology ring of BU(n)BU(n)